| Displaying 1 to 7 (of 7 reviews) |
Total Pages: 1 |
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Oh yeah! This tastes like a more full-bodied Monte #2. One of the most flavorful Habanos available. Earthy and slightly sweet with a hint of nougat. The only problem is that these characteristically have a tight draw. Never had a totally plugged one, but it sometimes takes a little work to consistently get a good mouthful of the exquisite smoke that resides in these monsters. In my opinion one of the 3 best tasting cigars in the world...if only they made it easier to draw on these it would get an 11 on a 10 point scale. Great floral aroma much like the Monte.
written by The Mantis
Rating: [5 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
If you have the good blend, then these Pacos exhibit some wonderful light to medium strength flavors of sweet spice,wood and dark notes within a good full draw. Tops in this vitola!
written by ca
Rating: [4 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Good firm construction with an exceptionally flat head.
Perfect draw and even burn. A bit timid start with notes of nuts and spices. The second half of the cigar proved excellent with a full taste of spices and earth with a slight hint of sulphur.
written by Peter N
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
....but, whilst it was very well made, a nice dark, firm wrapper, the draw from it was soooooo disapointing...too firm, maybe it was stored incorrectly (not bought from CGars!) but had that whole pain in the a$$ half-burn-down-the-cigar thing going on, got bored three quarters of the way through and dumped it.
I will try another one, as the SC range (esp. La Fuerza) are usually absolutely superb!
: )
written by Marcus
Rating: [2 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
I dont know what the makers intentions are, but this one is clearly a miss. Very tight draw, insignificant flavour and unappealing aroma. Let it go.
written by Mihai
Rating: [2 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
What was that! This smoke was certainly not typical of this brand. I found it boring (snoring). No complexity, tight draw, ....wrapper was nice! Wheres the beef? The cha cha...the umbpf, the get up and go? I dont really look forward to trying another.
written by Michael
Rating: [1 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Immensely dissappointing. Tight, thus little smoke, therefore little flavour therefore little pleasure. Mo, Im hoping the other one is better or Ill be sending the butt back!
written by asgard
Rating: [1 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| Displaying 1 to 7 (of 7 reviews) |
Total Pages: 1 |
|
 |
|