This site contains tobacco images. Please leave now if you are under 18
Cookies help us deliver the best experience on our website. By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with the C.Gars Privacy Policy
Fairly new to cigars but tried quite a few over the years. The No. 5 lights up easily enough and the burn is the most even I've seen. The draw was quite tight. Any more and would be pointless to smoke. Good cigar for a walk. 3 stars as has nothing on the No. 4 's but still a worthwhile satisfying…
After a very dissapointing experience with the Montecristo No. 4 I thought I'd pull this out and give it a wirl. Straight away I noticed the cigar felt very tight like the No. 4. Lit it up and found the same very tight unsmokable draw. I have heard good things about these cigars but they seem to be…
Creamy, with leather and hints of spice. I tried two of these; the first was fine with a slightly tight draw, the second had a very tight draw and uneven burn. The flavour's nice, but I won't return to this size Monty; there are numerous better and cheaper options available. My score is an average…
I had one of these with a morning coffee on the weekend and the 2 went very well together. Loads of smoke for such a small guy, great flavour and burnt well. For some reason I got a bit of a menthol taste, has anyone else experienced that? No idea where it came from but still I enjoyed the cigar…
I sampled this with a pint of London Pride ale after watching England draw 1 - 1 with Russia in the European Championships. Thought I was in for another disappointment as on lighting the flavours were rather nondescript to say the least. However this was short lived as after the first quarter inch…
