Cookies help us deliver the best experience on our website. By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with the C.Gars
Privacy Policy
This site contains tobacco images. Please leave now if you are under 18
The No. 2 ranks at the top for its complexity, yet consistency seems largely hit or miss. These are some of the best - and worst cigars I have ever smoked.
written by Pete
A ton of hype goes along with this cigar. Some of it is to be understood, some of it is a little much. No matter what, it is one of the more famous cigars out there, and a good smoke at that. One can see why many enjoy this stick.
written by mmeadows
What do I care if a cigar has a hint of this,a splash of that, or an aroma that smells like I have old donkeys in my living room for two weeks.The Montecristo No.2 is one helleva smoke!
written by Jon
Like a smile on a dog, I just dont see it. Construction is fine, wrapper always looks great, draw is perfect, only minor burn trouble... but... the smoke always strikes me as average. Better than average. Very good. But not the Holy Grail of Cuban cigars its so often touted as. Agreeable cocoa and…
I have only smoked one of these, but it was a powerful cigar. It also seemed to be a really tight draw, and between that and the buzz I got, I wasnt that impressed. However, it was not fully aged, and I will try another down the road.
written by SLH
Has suffered periods of inconsistent construction and quality, especially in the late 90s - early 00s. More recently, the sticks look fabulously dark, rich, oily and well rolled. They light well, and draw well, but the aroma and flavor are a bit shallow and harsh unless aged for at least two years.…