| Displaying 1 to 10 (of 10 reviews) |
Total Pages: 1 |
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
I may be but a mere novice and not up to the aficionado stage yet but I stumbled across this Sancho recently and it is perfect for me! Not too light, not too harsh, keeps together nicely and burns slow and even. Don't have to draw on it too heavily either (unlike Romeo y Julieta Coronation which was a touch disappointing). These are very well priced for singles on this site and I will be ordering here soon!!
written by Cliffy UK
Rating: [4 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
I`d tend to disagree here, folks. The Sancho Panza Belicoso is often compared (unfairly) to a Monte 2 or Vegas Robaina Unico - it`s not the same kind of cigar and is probably more analogous to a Diplomaticos 2. This is a fine light to mild torpedo with an open draw and leathery, woody tastes. I like Sancho Panzas very much and the Belicoso is a good example. The heavy gauge, however, lends for a few sharp notes - hell, sharp notes are a good thing, try a Monte some time - this is a fine Cuban cigar and I`d be very pleased if someone bought me a box. Mine don`t go out too often, either. No more than my Monte 2`s do.
written by Dave Francis
Rating: [4 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Enjoyed these quite a bit, somewhat mild but tasty. Get hooked on Boli Belicosos and these start to pale a bit. Great for new smokers.
written by JM USA
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Nothing special. I found them to be medium/full rather than light/medium. I agree with the reviewer who stated that they dont stay lit. Very leathery and woody with a bitter finish.
written by The Mantis
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
Perhaps too mild for my liking. This cigar however delivers a pleasant flavour and aroma. Uneven burn though and it also gets bitter towards the end. Not a particularly favourite after-dinner cigar.
written by Mihai
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
This cigar looks good enough to eat but disappoints soon after lighting, it gets soft, hot, and burns very uneven, you will need a flame thrower to keep this cigar lit.
written by Michael
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
A little light for my tastes but a really good cigar nethertheless. Good smoke, enough interest for a daytime smoke. Mild to med little complexity and doesnt give you the dragon breath of the big guns. Recommended.
written by asgard
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
An easy-going uncomplicated and unobtrusive daytime campana. For those who enjoy the full range of complexity, stuff a SC La Punta between your lips!!!
written by ca
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
I will agree that this is a bit on the light side now that my taste is changing for a stronger smoke, although it was still enjoyable with a pleasant taste. The last half got a bit hot, and it perhaps could have been a bit slower burning. Nice dark wrapper.
written by Adrian Boliston GBR
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| by ArchivedCgarsReviews |
Date Added: Thursday 08 November, 2007 |
|
 |
This cigar was enjoyable but also hard work. I had to work hard to keep this beast alive relighting several times. However it had some good earthy, peppery notes and a magnificent construction.
written by Antony Hunt
Rating: [3 of 5 Stars!] |
 |
|
|
 |
| Displaying 1 to 10 (of 10 reviews) |
Total Pages: 1 |
|
 |
|